PROFESSOR: HUD
OFFICE: BOND HALL
302A
PHONE: 650-3865
OFFICE HOURS: MW 1:00-2:00
COURSE: PHILOSOPHY 417 / SUMMER QUARTER 2009
CRN: 30413
LOCATION: BH 151
TIME: MW 3:00-5:15
REQUIRED TEXTS
|
|
Paradoxes from A to Z Michael Clark Routledge, 2002 |
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND
REQUIREMENTS
In this course we will carefully examine and critically discuss a number of fascinating and challenging paradoxes.
Each student enrolled in the course will be responsible for the following work: (i) giving a 30-35 minute class presentation on an assigned topic, (ii) submitting a first draft of a final paper (2000-3000 words) on July 20 (iii) submitting written comments on the first drafts of other students in an assigned group (at least 500 words each) on July 27, and (iv) submitting a final paper (2000-4000 words) on August 3.
Your presentation will be worth 25% of your final grade. Your final draft will be worth 75% of your final grade.
Presentation topics will be assigned on the first day of class. Each member of the seminar will give a 30-35 minute presentation on an assigned topic. Do not present for less than 30 minutes. Do not present for more than 35 minutes. Practice. Practice some more. In preparing your presentation, you should do some serious research into your topic on your own. Become very familiar with your subject matter. Finally, you will be expected to answer questions from the members of the seminar about your presentation and your assigned topic for the remainder of the class period. Your presentation will earn a letter grade based on the total of your scores in the following four areas: (i) 0-3 points: staying within the 30-35 minute time limit; (ii) 0-3 points: explanation of the topic and making clear exactly what is at issue; (iii) 0-3 points: discussion and critical evaluation of the topic; (iv) 0-3 points: overall quality of presentation (e.g., clarity, delivery, level of preparedness, responses to questions from the audience). You can score anywhere from 0-12 points: 12 = A+; 11 = A; 10 = A-; 9 = B+; 8 = B; 7 = B-; 6 = C+; 5 = C; 4 = C-; 3 = D+; 2 = D; 1 = D-; 0 = F.
Take the writing of the first draft of your final paper very seriously; a first draft falling below the 2000-word minimum will drop the final paper 1/3 of a letter grade. You will be assigned to one of four groups on the first day. You will be responsible for providing peer criticism on the first drafts of the members of your group. Peer criticism should be thoughtful, clear, constructive, and carefully written. I will grade each of the sets of comments on a satisfactory/unsatisfactory scale. Do your best on this -- it will matter to your colleagues. One or more unsatisfactory set of comments will drop the final paper 1/3 of a letter grade.
Finally, please note my policy on late assignments: The deadline for submitting the draft of your final paper is 3:03 on Monday, July 20 in class. After that -- it's late. The deadline for submitting peer criticism is 3:03 on Monday, July 27 in class. After that -- it's late. The deadline for submitting your final paper is noon on Monday, August 3 as an email attachment to Hud.Hudson@wwu.edu. After that -- it's late. Unless you make prior arrangements with me, a late assignment will drop the final paper one full letter grade if it is submitted within 24 hours of its deadline, 2 full letter grades if it is submitted within the next 24 hour period, and three full letter grades if it is submitted within the next 24 hour period. Late assignments should be submitted by email (which will allow me to verify the time of submission). Anything later than that puts you in danger of failing the course. Computers crash, disks fail, and computer labs get busy. Plan ahead.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT
As part of the philosophy department's
outcomes assessment plan, you will be required to complete a self-assessment
questionnaire and to email me both your completed questionnaire and
a copy of your final paper for our departmental files. I will email
you the self-assessment questionnaire. Please note that I will
not submit your final grade for the course until I have these two items.
COURSE
OUTLINE
|
|
||
|
06/24 |
Topic |
The Paradox of Foreknowledge |
|
|
Speaker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/29 |
Topic |
The Paradox of Deterrence |
|
|
Speaker |
Chris Bryant |
|
|
Topic |
The Paradox of Fiction |
|
|
Speaker | Seth Hersch |
| 07/01 | Topic |
Galileo's Paradox |
|
|
Speaker |
Patrick Everman |
| Topic | The Paradox of the Gods | |
| Speaker | Hud Hudson | |
|
|
|
|
|
07/06 |
Topic |
The Grue Paradox |
|
|
Speaker |
Mitchell Lee |
| Topic |
The Paradox of the Heap |
|
| Speaker | Justyn Smith | |
| 07/08 | Topic | The Liar Paradox |
| Speaker | Mario Olivencia | |
|
|
Topic |
The Paradox of the Many |
|
|
Speaker |
Eric Breuhaus |
|
|
|
|
|
07/13 |
Topic |
The Paradox of Moral Luck |
| Speaker | Chelsea Fletcher | |
|
|
Topic |
Newcomb's Problem |
|
|
Speaker |
Alex Larson |
|
|
|
|
| 07/15 | Topic |
The Paradox of the Preface |
| Speaker | Stephanie Crothers | |
| Topic |
The Paradox of Preference |
|
| Speaker | Kristin Johnson | |
|
|
|
|
|
07/20 |
Topic |
Prisoners' Dilemma |
|
|
|
Clinton Reddie |
|
Topic |
The Paradox of the Question | |
|
|
Speaker |
Mel Cafe |
| 07/22 | Topic |
Russell's Paradox |
| Speaker | Ian Chisholm | |
| Topic |
The Paradox of Self-Deception |
|
| Speaker | Zach Bauman | |
|
|
|
|
|
07/27 |
Topic |
The Ship of Theseus Paradox |
| Speaker | Rochelle Gagg | |
| Topic | The Aris Paradox | |
| Speaker | Hud Hudson | |
| 07/29 | Topic | Peer Review Sessions and Evaluations |
|
08/03 |
|
Final Paper Due as an Email Attachment by Noon |
|
|
|
|
| GROUP 1 | Bryant,
Cafe, Crothers,
Reddie |
|
| GROUP 2 | Chisholm, Johnson, Larson, Smith | |
| GROUP 3 | Bauman, Breuhaus, Gagg, Olivencia | |
| GROUP 4 | Everman, Fletcher, Hersch, Lee | |